Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Reflection on the Tragedy in Arizona

Monday, January 10th, 2011

Ok, so I will preface this by saying that I am not trying to make any political statement here. I’ve rarely (never) had any political commentary here on BackWords, so please do not construe this post as such.

Saturday afternoon, I was in New York celebrating my daughter’s tenth birthday when I heard of the tragedy in Arizona. I held my daughter close as she swallowed her birthday pizza when I heard that a 9 year old girl was amongst the fatalities. My heart goes out to everyone in Arizona, particularly those whose lives were directly impacted by this senseless act. My prayers are with the family of Christina Taylor Green as they mourn their unspeakable loss, and with the family of Representative Giffords as she embarks on what we all hope will be a speedy and good recovery.

In this time of loss, I feel it is important that we all take a moment to reflect upon the tone of political rhetoric in this country. With all of the talking heads, editorialists, and commentators out there, we are literally inundated with opinions and soundbites all day long. As such, it is very easy to forget that the words we all say carry weight, and effect those around us in different, yet meaningful ways.

Many studies have been done that underscore the actual effect words have. For example, studies have shown that if you repeat the same lie over and over (if I recall correctly, the magic number is 21 times) people will actually begin to adopt the lie as truth, even when logic tells them it is a lie. It is easy to see how similar repetition could have effects that extend out into other types of behaviors. With this knowledge, words become concrete entities- real life manifestations of our intent. Repeatedly using violence tinged metaphors can easily result in episodes like the one in Arizona.

I’m not blaming any party or individual other than the gunman who committed this horrible crime, so please don’t extrapolate anything beyond this: The rhetorical discourse being tossed about is more than just words being spoken. People really need to understand that when they say things, their words affect people. We all do it every day, and perhaps this is something we all need to consider before we open our mouths.

I would love to hear people discuss their differences, political or otherwise, without invoking hate speech, violent imagery, or other things which are at best disrespectful to those being targeted, and at worst potentially encouraging to the less stable folks amongst us to do horrific things.

Choose your words carefully, and give honest consideration to the meaning of what you are saying. Do your opinions need to be stated in ways that are threatening or insulting to those who don’t share your opinions? Can you educate people about your opinion without eviscerating those with a different approach? When did it become so hard to be kind to one another? Our nation was founded as a sanctuary for those who shared differing beliefs. We should all work hard to keep it that way.

Just something to think about.

Be well,

Andy

Wellness & Prevention: Real Health Care Reform

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

While there are lots of views about the way health insurance reform should play out, there is one thing which remains clear: As a whole we are not sufficiently focused on wellness & prevention. Most Americans think more about curing an illness after they have it, rather than addressing the lifestyle, nutritional, and fitness issues which may have prevented them from having it in the first place. These actions would save untold amounts of money, and have the added side effect of leaving everyone feeling healthier and happier.

Here is a short article from Mehmet Oz, M.D. which lays this out really well:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mehmet-oz/real-health-care-reform-w_b_356123.html

Enjoy,

Andy

A Personal Message to Ed Rendell About Malpractice insurance.

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Dear Governor Rendell,

I am one of the dwindling numbers of solo practitioners in the Philadelphia area. Each day, I provide family medical care and back pain care to people from around the Delaware Valley.

Like many physicians, I am very frustrated by the current medical malpractice insurance situation here in Pennsylvania. PA physicians face some of the highest malpractice premiums in the country, while being reimbursed lower than national average for services provided.

Each day I work in my office, I have calculated that the first five hours of each day go towards paying my overhead- a disproportionate amount of which is appropriated by my malpractice insurance costs. Part of that cost is the mCare premium- an expense which physicians in other states do not need to incur. Now, my understanding was that this additional premium, paid by me and every physician in the state, was to cover awards and expenses not covered by our regular insurance premium. I was also lead to understand that this mCare fund was created to keep MP insurance carriers in the state, and supposedly to keep our premiums from continuing to rise. On the first point, of course it kept them here- they got to keep more of their profits. Clearly, it has failed on the second count, as my insurance is roughly 30% higher than my friend is paying for the same coverage in Delaware.

So, while there may have been some legerdemain which justified the existence of the fund in the first place, there is no cover up or trick which you can use to justify the actions regarding the fund in the past month or so.

When physicians learned that there was a surplus of funds in the mCare coffers, and that you decided to direct those funds into the general budget to cover non-physician related costs, some said it was tantamount to theft.

It is not tantamount to theft- it is theft. Plain and simple, and you sir, are the thief.

Now, while I understand that you have no one to answer to, as you are not seeking re-election, you could have made the just and honest choice to waive the mCare fees, and/or return some of this ill-gotten money to the physicians who have worked so hard in your state to earn it. Instead, you chose to provide yet another reason for more doctors to flee this state in droves. I train student physicians and residents, and when I ask them where they would like to practice when they finish their training, they almost universally reply; “Anywhere but here.” This will result in a shortage of care in this state- and it will be your responsibility.

How long will physicians be willing to pay a tax for the privilege of practicing medicine in one of the most medically hostile environments in the country? I don’t know. How many physicians will be willing to pay the premium when they are sent their 2010 bill? I don’t know that either. What I do know is that you are rolling the dice , and the well being of Pennsylvania’s citizens is what’s at stake.

How about doing the right thing here. It’s not too late to fix what could be a catastrophic mistake.

-Andrew S. Kirschner, D.O.